понедельник, 12 марта 2012 г.

On the same page

Although the Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Council's fourth-floor offices at 225 Market St., Harrisburg, may be cramped, they hold a massive data collection and processing operation.

Every year, the council's 53 employees analyze millions of pieces of data, measuring everything from hospital revenues to surgical complication rates.

Given the sensitive nature of the information and how negative data such as falling revenues or increased mortality rates could affect the public's perception, of the health care system, hospitals and other health care organizations often criticize the council's findings.

Despite the sometimes tense relationship between the council and health care groups, both sides said they are working to find common ground.

Rocky start

Created by the General Assembly in 1986 as an independent state agency, the council collects and analyzes financial data, as well as quality performance data, from hospitals, doctors and managed-care plans statewide. The council publishes about six reports a year on its findings. These reports are free to the public.

Marc Volavka, who became its executive director in 1998, said many of the council's initial reports came under fire from the hospital community in the late 1980s and early 1990s.

Hospitals complained that the council's early reports used old data and estimates rather than current statistics to measure the cost and quality of health care, according to a Philadelphia Daily News article published in 1991. The Pennsylvania Medical Society, Lower Paxton Township, lobbied to get rid of the council in the early 1990s.

"The first two or three reports (the council) put out were highly controversial," Volavka explained. "When we put a report out and a local newspaper puts a headline that says 'hospitals kill people,' hospitals don't like that."

And while criticism of the council's data has not disappeared, both Volavka and representatives of area health care organizations said the relationship between the council and providers has become more productive.

For example, 60 percent of those who use the council's data represent hospitals, doctors and managed-care plans, according to Volavka.

"At first, doctors were sort of alarmed that performance and financial data was going to be available," said Bernie Lynch, director of medical economics for the Pennsylvania Medical Society. "But thee information (put out by the council) cannot be ignored. Ignorance is not bliss."

How it started

In 1986, two opposing forces - business and labor came together to fight a common foe: rising health care costs.

After several failed attempts to solve the problem on their own, business and labor groups asked the state to step in. Although some legislators suggested government price controls on health care products, a free-market approach instead guided the formation of the council.

"The concept was that (business and labor groups) would have information available to them where they could look at the quality and cost of health care and make their own choices about where they wanted to buy their health care," Volavka explained. "So the purchasers wanted to have a better idea of where they should buy their health care."

Today, the council's publicly available reports include:

* a report on hospital finances, including net patient revenue, total margins and operating margins;

* a report on hospital quality, including risk-adjusted mortality rates, risk-adjusted average lengths of stay, and average hospital charges; and

* an HMO-quality report measuring clinical results, preventive measures and member satisfaction information.

The council also sells customized reports and raw data to groups such as researchers and health care organizations. These reports cost from $200 to several thousand dollars," said Volavka. The council sells about 50 customized reports and 200 data sets per year.

The council receives about $3.8 million in annual state funding, but also makes about $700,000 through the sale of its data, Volavka said. Increases in state funding and in outside sales have boosted total revenue for the council from $2.7 million to $4.5 million over the past four years.

Under state law, hospitals have 90 days and managedcare plans have six months after the close of a quarter to provide data to the council. If the data is not provided in time, health care organizations may face fines of up to $10,000 a day, Volavka said. However, no one has ever been fined, he added.

Volavka said most organizations comply with the council's requests. for information.

Tension

Still, tensions remain. In late April, the council released a preview of its hospital financial report for FY 2000 and reported that net income for the state's hospitals more than doubled, from $295 million to $608 million.

The Hospital and Healthsystem Association of Pennsylvania in Swatara Township, which has voiced concerns over hospitals' financial struggles, responded with a press release expressing "strong reservations about the precision and usefulness" of the report.

"Even when viewed in a favorable light, this report is misleading," association president and CEO Carolyn Scanlan said in the release. "It gives policy-makers and the public the impression that, overall, hospitals are in good fiscal health - when precisely the opposite is the case."

Martin Ciccocioppo, the association's vice president of research, carefully chose his words when asked about the association's relationship with the council.

"The council's role in gathering information is important," Ciccocioppo said. "But we have some concerns about the council's methodology and agenda."

For example, the Hospital and Healthsystem Association "knew nothing about" the council's financial preview until it was released to the public on April 25, he claimed.

Ciccocioppo also questioned the validity of some council data.

Consumers should not base their health care choices solely on the council's information, added Amy Fink, spokeswoman for Memorial Hospital in Spring Garden Township.

"You can't really compare hospital to hospital, because there's different reporting criteria for differentsized hospitals," Fink said. For example, some hospitals split functions to other companies that don't have to report to the council. "The council, in our minds, is there to collect data and redistribute it to the community, but sometimes they try to interpret that data, and I don't know if that's its mission."

But Lynch said the Pennsylvania Medical Society was able to create a better working relationship with the council by voicing some of its concerns about the accuracy of the data.

Even Ciccocioppo admitted that working with the council can have positive results. Despite its reservations about some of the council's data, the association has increased its efforts to get hospitals to give data to the council in a timely manner.

"Now there's much greater compliance among hospitals sending in information to the council," he said. "That's a result of the council and (the association) working together."

Getting the word out

As it works to improve its relationship with health care providers, the council must also make the public more aware of the information the council provides, said Jim Godfrey, president of HealthGuard and a council member.

"Our goal is to attract more public interest," Godfrey said. "There's so much information out there, but we have to get the word out about it."

Godfrey said the council is making efforts to make its reports more readable and understandable to health care consurners.

For more information visit the website at www.phc4.org.

Fla. teen beating victim getting ready to go home

The 15-year-old Florida girl brutally attacked by another teen at a middle school is getting ready to go home.

Lawyer Sean Domnick says Josie Lou Ratley is undergoing physical, speech and occupational therapy at an undisclosed rehabilitation center. But Domnick says Ratley still faces a lengthy recovery.

Domnick has not said when Ratley will go home. Her mother will discuss Ratley's progress Wednesday at a news conference.

Fifteen-year-old Wayne Treacy is charged as an adult with first-degree attempted murder for the March 17 attack in Deerfield Beach, north of Fort Lauderdale. He has pleaded not guilty and has apologized through his lawyer for the beating. Ratley suffered brain damage in the assault.

___

Information from: South Florida Sun Sentinel, http://www.sun-sentinel.com

McDonald's initiatives beginning outside Chicago

Chicago area residents won't immediately see the results ofMcDonald's Corp.'s plans to simplify its fast-food menu, improveworker training and sell cappuccino at a McCafe.

In the Tampa, Fla., market, a computer-based e-learning program at180 McDonald's restaurants helps employees train for tough scenarios.

At an analysts' meeting Monday, McDonald's showed an example of aworker being coached on how to placate a man who had been fuming ashe waited in line behind a bus load of children.

The training program will be rolled out worldwide and is expectedto cut training costs by 15 percent. No timetable or training expensewas available.

Self-order kiosks, which let customers order via a machine akin toa bank's ATM, are being tested in five McDonald's in the Denver area.

CEO Jim Cantalupo touted the efficiency of the kiosks, saying theyovercome language barriers, speed up service and, when usedcorrectly, ensure no mistakes in ordering.

The kiosks will be introduced in a new market by the end of theyear, but McDonald's wouldn't say where. Each restaurant will havefour to five kiosks, which would sit on the right side of the servicecounter.

The next trial will feature kiosks at McDonald's PlayPlace areas,so parents with small children can order without having to go to thecounter. An employee will bring the food to a table.

Separately, Chicago will not see a return this year of the OakBrook-based chain's coffee shop, called McCafe. The 10 McCafes slatedto open this year will be in the Northwest and in the Washington,D.C., area.

McDonald's opened its first McCafe in the United States at 115 N.Wabash Ave. in May 2001, but closed it seven months later to make wayfor a 57-story condo high-rise.

However, Chicago area residents will benefit from another ofMcDonald's efforts to boost its appeal to young people ages 18-29.Later this year, an undetermined number of Chicago area McDonald'srestaurants will be outfitted with wireless Internet access, calledWi-Fi.

McDonald's will offer one hour of free high-speed access to anyonewho buys a combination meal at select restaurants in New York,Chicago and an as-yet-unnamed city in California.

The company also will expand its advertising beyond TV, presumablyplacing a greater emphasis on the Web, and give Ronald McDonald morevisibility in its efforts to attract young adults.

In the Rockford area and in Ohio, McDonald's has introducedsimpler menus and cash registers designed to speed service. The menuitems have prices that end in zeros and fives so customers can easilyadd and subtract as they decide what to order.

Behind the counter, automatic beverage dispensers in the drive-through and automatic cooking-oil systems in the kitchen are beinginstalled to further cut service times and simplify operations.

Cantalupo and other executives described the company's "Plan toWin" at the analyst meeting Monday.

It was a case of good news preceding bad, one analyst cautioned.McDonald's will release its sales results for March on Thursday andits first-quarter 2003 earnings on April 28--results that likely willresult in negative investor reaction, said Citigroup Smith Barneyanalyst Mark Kalinowski.

Analysts questioned how much the new efforts will help McDonald's,which has suffered 12 months of sales declines.

Mitchell Speiser, analyst at Lehman Brothers, wrote in a note toclients that improving speed of service amid much change "will betough," especially as McDonald's rivals tout their own innovations.

Gator accused of starting fire at abandoned school

A four-foot alligator rescued in an abandoned school on fire in western Pennsylvania may have also started the blaze. North Beaver Township officials are not identifying the owner of the former elementary school that burned Thursday afternoon near New Castle, about 40 miles northwest of Pittsburgh.

But they said the man was living with a menagerie of animals in the building, including the alligator, about 70 rabbits and unspecified "aquatic animals." The Pennsylvania Game Commission was involved in caring for the animal.

Fire Chief Paul Henry said the building's owner believes the alligator started the fire by knocking over a portable heater. Firefighters removed the animal, but only after taping its mouth shut.

6-Run 2nd Inning Lifts Royals Over Phils

KANSAS CITY, Mo. - Mark Grudzielanek and Mike Sweeney homered in a six-run second inning to power Kansas City past Philadelphia 8-4 Friday night in the Phillies' first visit to Kauffman Stadium since the 1980 World Series.

Scott Elarton (2-2) gave up three home runs, including Ryan Howard's mammoth two-run shot, but went five innings for the victory as the Royals snapped a seven-game home losing skid.

Closer Octavio Dotel came on with runners on first and second and two out in the ninth, and got Jimmy Rollins to hit into a double play for his third save in as many chances.

Freddy Garcia (1-5) lasted only 1 2-3 innings for the Phillies, who had won six straight on the road.

Garcia, winless in eight starts since April 22, was charged with six runs on seven hits and his ERA climbed from 5.11 to 6.05. He was handed a 3-0 lead going into the second but got in quick trouble when Jason LaRue doubled and Tony Pena Jr. singled.

Joey Gathright's infield out pushed the first run across, then David DeJesus doubled home Pena. Grudzielanek's home run bounced off the foul pole into the bleachers in fair territory, putting the Royals on top 4-3.

Garcia, who faced the Royals 21 times while with Seattle and Chicago, walked Mark Teahen and Sweeney lined a 3-2 pitch into the visitors bullpen.

Gathright and Pena each drove in a run in the seventh and Pena, DeJesus and LaRue all had three hits for the Royals, who hadn't won at home since May 23.

Elarton gave up four runs on six hits, with one walk and three strikeouts in his second victory since shoulder surgery last Aug. 1.

Rollins led off the game with a double and Howard drove Elarton's 2-2 pitch 428 feet into the right field water display for a 2-0 lead. Greg Dobbs had a solo homer in the second and Rod Barajas hit his third home run in the fifth.

Philadelphia All-Star Chase Utley, whose .308 average coming into the series led all NL second basemen, struck out four times and stranded four runners. But he made a great running, sliding catch with his back to the infield to save a run in the seventh.

Notes:@ The first 20,000 spectators entering the stadium got a pin commemorating the 1980 Phillies-Royals World Series. Philadelphia won the Series, its only world championship, in six games. ... The six-run second tied KC's best for an inning this year. ... It's the start of a nine-game interleague homestand for the Royals, who'll also host St. Louis and Florida.

среда, 7 марта 2012 г.

Sticks pick up steam

If Derrek Lee's sore back keeps him out of the Cubs' lineup for more than a day or so, cleanup hitter Aramis Ramirez demonstrated a possible way to fill the void Saturday.

In fact, Ramirez had the answers to almost everything that has ailed the Cubs' lineup lately, hitting a three-run home run for an early lead in the fourth, then adding another three-run shot in the eighth after Lee left the game to make it a 9-2 rout over the woeful Washington Nationals at Wrigley Field.

''If he gets going, it's a pretty dangerous lineup,'' said second baseman Mark DeRosa, who hit a solo home run in the sixth.

While starting ace Ryan Dempster (15-5) provided another 7�-inning example of the biggest reason why the Cubs have the best record in baseball, Ramirez's six-RBI jump to 90 for the season was a sign the lineup might be ready to stir again after a weeklong snooze -- coming on the same afternoon DeRosa hit his third homer in as many days and Ryan Theriot delivered his 49th multihit game of the season.

''We've got a great offense. You guys [media] panic too quick,'' Ramirez said of the 13-hit game that came a day after an embarrassing 13-5 loss to the Nationals.

Maybe we should have waited until Lee hurt his back on an awkward swing as he struck out in the fifth. Or until he had to reach for a wide throw from Dempster in the sixth and felt it ''grab'' again, as Piniella described it, then left the game.

''We took him out to put some heat on him to see if we can get him ready for tomorrow,'' said Piniella, who was unsure whether Lee would be back in the lineup for the series finale today.

The Cubs are calling it ''upper back spasms.'' Lee was gone by the time media arrived in the clubhouse after the game.

Whether it's one day or 12 without their No. 3 hitter, the Cubs needed a breakout day, if only for their own psyches -- or to put a few of the questions to rest about men left on base in recent games.

In fact, the Cubs left eight men on base in the first three innings before Lee's RBI single and Ramirez's first home run finally scored some runs.

''Our team never wavers. We know we're capable of scoring runs,'' DeRosa said. ''It was just nice to see one of our big guys pop the ball out of the yard and get us a 4-0 lead. And then he comes up again in the eighth inning and drives another one out.''

And with the whole lineup getting on base throughout the game -- reaching in every inning and 20 times in all -- maybe they're out of the minislump.

''We should be,'' said Ramirez, who is hitting .432 with three homers and 15 RBI in his last 11 games.

''I hope so,'' DeRosa said. ''Guys swung the bats well. Ryan [Theriot] had three hits. Aramis obviously had a huge day. There's just a bunch of guys who found their way on base today.

''But I always go back to Ryan [Dempster] just putting up zeroes after we put up runs. That's the key. You go out and put up three or four runs, and you want your pitcher to go throw a doughnut up on the board, and he's been able to do that time and time again for us.''

Which might have something to do with that big lead in the division and that record that's back up to 29 games over .500.

''It's been fun. It's been fun for all of us,'' Dempster said. ''We're having a great time, and we just want to keep it going.''

Comment at suntimes.com.

---

Game Recap

At the plate Two three-run homers by Aramis Ramirez, along with a solo shot by Mark DeRosa - his third consecutive game with a homer -- roused the Cubs' lineup out of a weeklong slumber.

On the mound If Ryan Dempster (15-5) isn't the Cubs' ace, he sure looks like one. Taking a shutout into the seventh inning, he finished a strong 7� innings on a sweatbox day for his third victory in a row.

Pivotal point After leaving eight men on base in the first three innings, the Cubs broke through in the fourth, with Derrek Lee's one-out single and Ramirez's ensuing long ball, his first of the game.

On deck The Cubs' Rich Harden (3-1, 1.50 ERA) vs. the Nationals' Jason Bergmann (2-9, 4.50), 1:20 p.m. today, Ch. 9, 720-AM.

Color Photo: Richard A. Chapman, Sun-Times / Aramis Ramirez (center) returns to the dugout after hitting his second three-run homer of the game in the eighth inning. ;

Have the haredim won the battle for Bar-Ilan?

Elli Wohlgelernter
Jerusalem Post
04-18-1997
On November 1, 1993, the day before the mayoral elections in Jerusalem, Ehud Olmert made a political deal with Agudat Yisrael-Degel Hatorah candidate Meir Porush: drop out of the race, and the haredim will be given widespread powers in an Olmert administration.

He did, Olmert won, and suddenly the haredim had gained unprecedented political muscle in Jerusalem.

Three weeks later, on Friday night, November 26, dozens of haredim demonstrated at the north Jerusalem intersection of Shmuel Hanavi and Bar-Ilan streets, only instead of just yelling "Shabbes, Shabbes" at passing motorists, they also threw stones for the first time.

It was the beginning of the battle for Bar-Ilan.

Now, three years later, it looks like the war is over. The High Court's ruling on Sunday that Transport Minister Yitzhak Levy could, under certain conditions, close the street to traffic has given the haredim the foothold they need to eventually close it down completely.

The idea at first seemed far-fetched: while some local haredi neighborhood streets had long been closed on Shabbat, such as those in Mea She'arim and Bayit Vegan in Jerusalem, or the entire religious town of Bnei Brak, Bar-Ilan Street was a major east-west thoroughfare, serving residents from all over Jerusalem. How could such a main traffic artery be closed?

But then one day it happened. It was only temporary, everyone said, but still it happened. It was June 1994, and Moshe Teitelbaum, the Satmar rebbe, was coming to the neighborhood for the dedication of a new yeshiva and staying for Shabbat. Tens of thousands were expected to join him.

Jerusalem police spokesman Shmuel Ben-Ruby said it was a one-time deal, and that the Eda Haredit, which had campaigned at City Hall for years to get the street closed, had so been informed.

"A hundred thousand people will be going to the rebbe's house near the street," Ben-Ruby said. "Once in a dozen years it's acceptable to close the street."

It was a precedent too good to ignore. Yehuda Meshi-Zahav, an activist in the Eda Haredit, said "the argument against closing the street has always been that there is nowhere to divert traffic. This will make it clear that traffic can be diverted elsewhere, and no tragedy will result."

A few days later, posters were put up calling for a demonstration that upcoming Shabbat afternoon. Hundreds of haredim rioted, rolling trash bins into the middle of Bar-Ilan and throwing stones at passing motorists. Eight demonstrators were detained, but police were able to keep the road open to traffic.

The following Shabbat, June 24, saw a new addition to the street spectacle: an anti-protest protest, led by Meretz city councilman Ornan Yekutieli, a long-standing militant proponent of secular rights.

How militant? He was quoted that week saying that drivers caught in "haredi mobs... should put their foot on the gas and flee, even if people are standing in front of them." United Torah Judaism MK Avraham Ravitz said Yekutieli's words amounted to "incitement to murder," and that "he should be jailed."

Until that week the Eda Haredit had not been involved in the demonstrations, which had been organized by an amorphous "Action Committee," but they decided after a meeting to join in the protests. Two haredim were arrested, and the small group of protesters led by Yekutieli were mostly ignored by the haredim.

But the battle was now in full force, and in September Olmert appointed a committee headed by Eliezer Strum to look into ways to solve the problem.

His recommendation a few months later was that Bar-Ilan Street be closed during prayer times, for 90 minutes at the start of Shabbat, on Shabbat morning from 7:30 to 11:30, and 105 minutes before the close of Shabbat. Traffic would be permitted at all other times.

With a committee now having been formed, it was time to show haredi strength in numbers, to let the politicians know how their political partners vote with their feet. On October 21, 1994, over 50,000 gathered for a demonstration that was almost entirely peaceful (only two haredim were detained, for throwing stones at a police car).

But the massive show of support also served to mobilize the opposition. In November, then-Labor MK Emanuel Zissmann initiated a bill in the Knesset designed to prevent local authorities from closing streets without permission from the Knesset's Interior Committee. "I declare that I, together with other MKs and residents of the city, will under no circumstances, even if we have to bring out masses of people to demonstrate, allow the city to be shut down and harm the fragile and delicate fabric of life in Jerusalem."

Meretz began holding regular weekly demonstrations on Friday afternoons. The first, by 150 protesters, saw 20 arrested, while passing motorists honked in support of the left-wing activists who were trying to block traffic. Police ticketed the honking drivers. The Meretz demonstrations continued for 10 weeks, after which they said they would wait for a decision by Olmert.

The haredim, too, continued to demonstrate week after week, with a larger crowd showing up depending on whether any political developments had occurred that week.

While the recommendations from the Strum committee were being decided, the state got in on the act: the Transport Ministry said it was not the city's decision to make but the government's, and they would make any determination over closure.

The municipal council nevertheless recommended that the Transport Ministry close Bar-Ilan, but minister Yisrael Kessar decided not to. In November, the street was again closed for a visitor, the Vishnitzer rebbe, Rabbi Moshe Hager, who was visiting from Bnei Brak. Police said, again, that it was a one-time-only closure.

WITH THE election of Binyamin Netanyahu last May, a religious coalition not unlike Olmert's took shape, and a new transport minister, Yitzhak Levy, was appointed from the National Religious Party.

For the haredim on Bar-Ilan Street, it was a gift from the political gods.

"I have no doubt that one of the first things Yitzhak Levy will do as transport minister will be to close Bar-Ilan Street on Shabbat and holidays," Jerusalem Deputy Mayor Haim Miller (United Torah Judaism) said, even before Levy was officially appointed.

Meretz, meanwhile, had petitioned the High Court of Justice to be allowed to march down the street, which the police had refused them permission to do, fearing a riot. In July the court agreed.

But President Ezer Weizman asked Meretz to postpone their march until a solution could be found, which they agreed to do. Nevertheless, violent clashes took place that Shabbat when 3,000 protesters showed up, throwing stones, bottles, vegetables and dirty diapers at police. Police used water cannons to disperse the protesters, who screamed "Nazis" at the policemen. Thirteen haredim were arrested, in what was described as the worst demonstration at the site.

Four days later, Levy told the Knesset that Bar-Ilan would be closed on Shabbat and holidays during prayer times beginning that Friday night, and the partial closure would remain in effect for four months, and then be reevaluated.

Immediately, two petitions were filed with the High Court of Justice asking for a temporary injunction against the partial closure, which the court issued.

The demonstrations continued to grow bigger and more violent throughout last summer, culminating on July 27 when over 150,000 haredim gathered for a mostly peaceful protest.

Three days later the High Court decided to hear four petitions over the road closing before a seven-judge panel; and the rabbinical leadership of the Eda Haredit issued a halachic ruling the next day forbidding stone-throwing or other acts of violence during Shabbat demonstrations.

Still looking for a solution that would benefit all, Mayor Olmert then proposed digging a multi-million-dollar tunnel to replace Bar-Ilan Street.

"We must find a solution that will provide an answer to the [haredi] residents, and those who are unwilling to give up their right to drive in the area on Shabbat," Olmert said. "There is no other solution than a road that will not disturb the haredim and will not infringe on the right of the secular population to travel - and that means digging a tunnel."

The High Court ruled in August that Bar-Ilan would remain open to traffic on Shabbat for the time being, but that a public commission will be set up to study the whole issue of traffic arrangements in the capital on Shabbat. This idea was accepted by the government, the secular petitioners and the haredi representatives alike.

Transport Minister Levy established the committee at the end of August, which was headed by Dr. Zvi Zameret, the director of the Ben-Zvi Institute in Jerusalem. Other members included Prof. Galia Golan, Rabbi Zvi Weinman, Eliahu Hasson, Rabbi Shmuel Jakobovitz, Rabbi She'ar-Yashuv Cohen, Prof. Eliezer Schwei, and Prof. Daniel Sperber.

The committee proposed that for the present, Bar-Ilan Street be closed on Shabbat during synagogue services, and that when work on Highway 4 is completed, providing an alternate route, it be closed entirely on Shabbat.

The committee also recommended that the transportation needs of the secular community on Shabbat be taken into consideration.

The High Court of Justice then ruled this week, overturning Levy's decision that Bar-Ilan be closed to traffic during prayer times on Shabbat and holidays. But at the same time, a majority of the seven-justice panel said that if a solution could be found for the secular residents of the street and the neighborhoods that border it, Levy's decision could stand.

A compromise is now being worked out, and it looks like at some point in the future Bar-Ilan will be closed down for most - or all - of Shabbat.

(BOX) Pessah cease-fire but the battle goes on

The Eda Haredit has agreed to a seven-day cease-fire in the fight over Bar-Ilan Street: The week of Pessah.

Eda Haredit activist Yehuda Meshi-Zahav said yesterday that a promise was made to police not to demonstrate over the holiday, after police said that officers would be prevented from being with their families if they had to man the streets at a demonstration.

Nevertheless, Meshi-Zahav said, "if there is no change after the holiday, we plan on holding on Erev Rosh Hodesh Iyar [May 6] one of the biggest demonstrations ever seen in this country." He said the demonstration had the approval of the Eda Haredit as well as all the leading rabbis, who will call on their followers to take to the streets.

The demonstrations are required to keep up the pressure, he said, because despite what the High Court ruled this week, "we don't know if we won - you can never be sure how it's going to come out from the bagatz. There hasn't been any difference on the ground, so from our perspective we can't stop the demonstrations."

Jerusalem City Councilman Ornan Yekutieli (Meretz), leader of the fight for secular rights, said that the court's overall decision to return the ruling back to Transport Minister Yitzhak Levy "was unreasonable, when you know that the minister of transport is Orthodox, and he does what he does by what he thinks God wants him to do. He doesn't take into consideration either transportation issues or the future of Jerusalem as the capital of the state of Israel and not just the holy city. So he'll be looking very strongly how to close the road during prayer hours as fast as possible."

The one silver lining in the court's ruling, he said, was that they set one condition: "That there will be no violence.

"They said that very clearly. If secular cars will start being attacked during hours when the road is open, and cars will be damaged, then within 24 hours we will be back in court with the fact that the condition was not respected. We're going to start testing the High Court of Justice to see if they meant what they said."

Copyright 1997 Jerusalem Post. All Rights Reserved
Have the haredim won the battle for Bar-Ilan?Elli Wohlgelernter
Jerusalem Post
04-18-1997
On November 1, 1993, the day before the mayoral elections in Jerusalem, Ehud Olmert made a political deal with Agudat Yisrael-Degel Hatorah candidate Meir Porush: drop out of the race, and the haredim will be given widespread powers in an Olmert administration.

He did, Olmert won, and suddenly the haredim had gained unprecedented political muscle in Jerusalem.

Three weeks later, on Friday night, November 26, dozens of haredim demonstrated at the north Jerusalem intersection of Shmuel Hanavi and Bar-Ilan streets, only instead of just yelling "Shabbes, Shabbes" at passing motorists, they also threw stones for the first time.

It was the beginning of the battle for Bar-Ilan.

Now, three years later, it looks like the war is over. The High Court's ruling on Sunday that Transport Minister Yitzhak Levy could, under certain conditions, close the street to traffic has given the haredim the foothold they need to eventually close it down completely.

The idea at first seemed far-fetched: while some local haredi neighborhood streets had long been closed on Shabbat, such as those in Mea She'arim and Bayit Vegan in Jerusalem, or the entire religious town of Bnei Brak, Bar-Ilan Street was a major east-west thoroughfare, serving residents from all over Jerusalem. How could such a main traffic artery be closed?

But then one day it happened. It was only temporary, everyone said, but still it happened. It was June 1994, and Moshe Teitelbaum, the Satmar rebbe, was coming to the neighborhood for the dedication of a new yeshiva and staying for Shabbat. Tens of thousands were expected to join him.

Jerusalem police spokesman Shmuel Ben-Ruby said it was a one-time deal, and that the Eda Haredit, which had campaigned at City Hall for years to get the street closed, had so been informed.

"A hundred thousand people will be going to the rebbe's house near the street," Ben-Ruby said. "Once in a dozen years it's acceptable to close the street."

It was a precedent too good to ignore. Yehuda Meshi-Zahav, an activist in the Eda Haredit, said "the argument against closing the street has always been that there is nowhere to divert traffic. This will make it clear that traffic can be diverted elsewhere, and no tragedy will result."

A few days later, posters were put up calling for a demonstration that upcoming Shabbat afternoon. Hundreds of haredim rioted, rolling trash bins into the middle of Bar-Ilan and throwing stones at passing motorists. Eight demonstrators were detained, but police were able to keep the road open to traffic.

The following Shabbat, June 24, saw a new addition to the street spectacle: an anti-protest protest, led by Meretz city councilman Ornan Yekutieli, a long-standing militant proponent of secular rights.

How militant? He was quoted that week saying that drivers caught in "haredi mobs... should put their foot on the gas and flee, even if people are standing in front of them." United Torah Judaism MK Avraham Ravitz said Yekutieli's words amounted to "incitement to murder," and that "he should be jailed."

Until that week the Eda Haredit had not been involved in the demonstrations, which had been organized by an amorphous "Action Committee," but they decided after a meeting to join in the protests. Two haredim were arrested, and the small group of protesters led by Yekutieli were mostly ignored by the haredim.

But the battle was now in full force, and in September Olmert appointed a committee headed by Eliezer Strum to look into ways to solve the problem.

His recommendation a few months later was that Bar-Ilan Street be closed during prayer times, for 90 minutes at the start of Shabbat, on Shabbat morning from 7:30 to 11:30, and 105 minutes before the close of Shabbat. Traffic would be permitted at all other times.

With a committee now having been formed, it was time to show haredi strength in numbers, to let the politicians know how their political partners vote with their feet. On October 21, 1994, over 50,000 gathered for a demonstration that was almost entirely peaceful (only two haredim were detained, for throwing stones at a police car).

But the massive show of support also served to mobilize the opposition. In November, then-Labor MK Emanuel Zissmann initiated a bill in the Knesset designed to prevent local authorities from closing streets without permission from the Knesset's Interior Committee. "I declare that I, together with other MKs and residents of the city, will under no circumstances, even if we have to bring out masses of people to demonstrate, allow the city to be shut down and harm the fragile and delicate fabric of life in Jerusalem."

Meretz began holding regular weekly demonstrations on Friday afternoons. The first, by 150 protesters, saw 20 arrested, while passing motorists honked in support of the left-wing activists who were trying to block traffic. Police ticketed the honking drivers. The Meretz demonstrations continued for 10 weeks, after which they said they would wait for a decision by Olmert.

The haredim, too, continued to demonstrate week after week, with a larger crowd showing up depending on whether any political developments had occurred that week.

While the recommendations from the Strum committee were being decided, the state got in on the act: the Transport Ministry said it was not the city's decision to make but the government's, and they would make any determination over closure.

The municipal council nevertheless recommended that the Transport Ministry close Bar-Ilan, but minister Yisrael Kessar decided not to. In November, the street was again closed for a visitor, the Vishnitzer rebbe, Rabbi Moshe Hager, who was visiting from Bnei Brak. Police said, again, that it was a one-time-only closure.

WITH THE election of Binyamin Netanyahu last May, a religious coalition not unlike Olmert's took shape, and a new transport minister, Yitzhak Levy, was appointed from the National Religious Party.

For the haredim on Bar-Ilan Street, it was a gift from the political gods.

"I have no doubt that one of the first things Yitzhak Levy will do as transport minister will be to close Bar-Ilan Street on Shabbat and holidays," Jerusalem Deputy Mayor Haim Miller (United Torah Judaism) said, even before Levy was officially appointed.

Meretz, meanwhile, had petitioned the High Court of Justice to be allowed to march down the street, which the police had refused them permission to do, fearing a riot. In July the court agreed.

But President Ezer Weizman asked Meretz to postpone their march until a solution could be found, which they agreed to do. Nevertheless, violent clashes took place that Shabbat when 3,000 protesters showed up, throwing stones, bottles, vegetables and dirty diapers at police. Police used water cannons to disperse the protesters, who screamed "Nazis" at the policemen. Thirteen haredim were arrested, in what was described as the worst demonstration at the site.

Four days later, Levy told the Knesset that Bar-Ilan would be closed on Shabbat and holidays during prayer times beginning that Friday night, and the partial closure would remain in effect for four months, and then be reevaluated.

Immediately, two petitions were filed with the High Court of Justice asking for a temporary injunction against the partial closure, which the court issued.

The demonstrations continued to grow bigger and more violent throughout last summer, culminating on July 27 when over 150,000 haredim gathered for a mostly peaceful protest.

Three days later the High Court decided to hear four petitions over the road closing before a seven-judge panel; and the rabbinical leadership of the Eda Haredit issued a halachic ruling the next day forbidding stone-throwing or other acts of violence during Shabbat demonstrations.

Still looking for a solution that would benefit all, Mayor Olmert then proposed digging a multi-million-dollar tunnel to replace Bar-Ilan Street.

"We must find a solution that will provide an answer to the [haredi] residents, and those who are unwilling to give up their right to drive in the area on Shabbat," Olmert said. "There is no other solution than a road that will not disturb the haredim and will not infringe on the right of the secular population to travel - and that means digging a tunnel."

The High Court ruled in August that Bar-Ilan would remain open to traffic on Shabbat for the time being, but that a public commission will be set up to study the whole issue of traffic arrangements in the capital on Shabbat. This idea was accepted by the government, the secular petitioners and the haredi representatives alike.

Transport Minister Levy established the committee at the end of August, which was headed by Dr. Zvi Zameret, the director of the Ben-Zvi Institute in Jerusalem. Other members included Prof. Galia Golan, Rabbi Zvi Weinman, Eliahu Hasson, Rabbi Shmuel Jakobovitz, Rabbi She'ar-Yashuv Cohen, Prof. Eliezer Schwei, and Prof. Daniel Sperber.

The committee proposed that for the present, Bar-Ilan Street be closed on Shabbat during synagogue services, and that when work on Highway 4 is completed, providing an alternate route, it be closed entirely on Shabbat.

The committee also recommended that the transportation needs of the secular community on Shabbat be taken into consideration.

The High Court of Justice then ruled this week, overturning Levy's decision that Bar-Ilan be closed to traffic during prayer times on Shabbat and holidays. But at the same time, a majority of the seven-justice panel said that if a solution could be found for the secular residents of the street and the neighborhoods that border it, Levy's decision could stand.

A compromise is now being worked out, and it looks like at some point in the future Bar-Ilan will be closed down for most - or all - of Shabbat.

(BOX) Pessah cease-fire but the battle goes on

The Eda Haredit has agreed to a seven-day cease-fire in the fight over Bar-Ilan Street: The week of Pessah.

Eda Haredit activist Yehuda Meshi-Zahav said yesterday that a promise was made to police not to demonstrate over the holiday, after police said that officers would be prevented from being with their families if they had to man the streets at a demonstration.

Nevertheless, Meshi-Zahav said, "if there is no change after the holiday, we plan on holding on Erev Rosh Hodesh Iyar [May 6] one of the biggest demonstrations ever seen in this country." He said the demonstration had the approval of the Eda Haredit as well as all the leading rabbis, who will call on their followers to take to the streets.

The demonstrations are required to keep up the pressure, he said, because despite what the High Court ruled this week, "we don't know if we won - you can never be sure how it's going to come out from the bagatz. There hasn't been any difference on the ground, so from our perspective we can't stop the demonstrations."

Jerusalem City Councilman Ornan Yekutieli (Meretz), leader of the fight for secular rights, said that the court's overall decision to return the ruling back to Transport Minister Yitzhak Levy "was unreasonable, when you know that the minister of transport is Orthodox, and he does what he does by what he thinks God wants him to do. He doesn't take into consideration either transportation issues or the future of Jerusalem as the capital of the state of Israel and not just the holy city. So he'll be looking very strongly how to close the road during prayer hours as fast as possible."

The one silver lining in the court's ruling, he said, was that they set one condition: "That there will be no violence.

"They said that very clearly. If secular cars will start being attacked during hours when the road is open, and cars will be damaged, then within 24 hours we will be back in court with the fact that the condition was not respected. We're going to start testing the High Court of Justice to see if they meant what they said."

Copyright 1997 Jerusalem Post. All Rights Reserved